H.-G. Giesa, T. Köhler

The method CREAM provides a set of cognitive activities to build cognitive demands profiles that are used for human error prediction. The intention of this study was to improve the practicability of building cognitive demands profiles and to increase its interrater reliability by a revision of the definitions of the cognitive activities. The first step was a review of the definitions by 14 German experts by means of a questionnaire. The revised definitions are presented in this paper. A further evaluation of the revised definitions was performed with the support of five HRA-experts who were asked to build cognitive demands profiles for, an exemplified CREAM-analysis twice: first with the original definitions and second with the revised definitions. The concordance between the HRA-experts was already surprising high in building a cognitive demands profile using the original definitions and could not be improved by the revision of the definitions. The HRA-experts assessed the support provided by the revised defmitions as noticeably better than by the original definitions although the scope of interpretation was not reduced.

8th Conference on Cognitive Science, Neubiberg, 2001

Book Chapter

englisch

A5, 8 Seiten

DGLR-Bericht, 2001, 2001-04, CSAPC 01 - 8th Conference on Cognitive Science - Approaches to Process Control "The Cognitive Work Process: Automation and Interaction"; S.277-284; 2001; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luft- und Raumfahrt - Lilienthal-Oberth e.V., Bonn

NA

cognitive systems

Bestellbar

2001